Resistance to Theohumanity and EBE
Theohumanity and EBE stand for, search for the source of, and directly elicit the emergence of the heroic in a human being. Embodying the heroic human in Theohumanistic terms only occurs in a context of the deep and abiding emotional maturity involved in true self-authentication. But this heroic being, inherent in all of us, is buried under a mountain of unconscious strategy, repressed woundings, and existential terrors, and its emergence does not fit the agenda of the current version of us unwilling to deconstruct and shed the familial, societal, religious, spiritual, and philosophical conditioning which prevents such a guileless and courageous version of ourselves to arise and abide as our true natures.
Invisibly possessed of an inauthentic strategic version of selfhood not recognized as such, when confronted with the elements of the mountain beneath which the most authentic version of self exists, most people resist. This is because of the sticky and codependent relational space we have been conditioned to construct as the beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and energies imparted to us by profoundly inauthentic, metaphysically ill, and deeply incomplete psychological, religious, philosophical, and spiritual institutions of our world. Our world is largely only interested in supporting us to preserve and legitimate the status quo of our lives and all of our codependent allegiances to dystrophic familial patterns and outworn religious or spiritual teachings that obfuscate and not liberate the true spirit of our soul.
In that way, EBE and Theohumanity are occasionally seen as dangerous by those unconsciously steeped in the denial of the defensivity of their own emotionally congested worlds. EBE is unapologetically dangerous, but only to the defenses who safeguard the preservation of a person’s mediocrity, emotional immaturity, and the mountain of inauthentic strategies that unconsciously cover their truer heroic and divine natures. Those who thus decry EBE as dangerous only trumpet their innocent fusion to their defensive aspects of being. These aspects are always demonstrable as the agency of their resistance once their backstory, never made as public as their criticisms, is exposed as the explanation for their outsized reaction.
It is not surprising that EBE or Theohumanity draw challenge in these ways: all the true paradigm shifts of our species are resisted in their time. But since no adult does anything they do not consciously choose and consciously wish to do whether they are conscious of that or not, to thus play victim to one’s own choices against those whom they chose to ask for help, is the heart of disingenuity and proof of an arrested development that unconsciously seeks to keep one feeling as a child victimized by a journey they themselves chose to explore, and in the end, reject.
So resistance is expected: EBE relentlessly offers and informs interested persons that only a tiny percentage of human beings are ready to self-authenticate in the rigorous ways EBE offers as self-validating once gotten past a certain critical point in the EBE journey. Because of the depth of our dystrophic conditioning as individuals and as a collective family of human consciousness, opposition to EBE and Theohumanity is thus more the norm, and their acceptance is always surprisingly the exception. But a rejection that secondarily plays victim to its own choices abdicates its adult self-responsibility. It also proves unerringly that the diagnosis of the specific element of emotive immaturity offered to a person in the mirror of EBE’s heartful clarity that actually caused them to unchoose EBE in an early segment of their work in the first place, was completely accurate, shown to be true by the way they have reacted.
In this way, EBE invites anyone who might dare to make a long-term commitment to dismantle the current version of themselves at source for all their unmanifested dreams, codependent patterns, limited spiritual attainments, and non-abidement with their own divine natures, to test for themselves what is dangerous and what is not. In the end, only an emotively immature and victim-based consciousness sees danger in any aspect of life that calls out the truer foundation of their divine being, especially one that will, over time, completely validate the claim that it can.
daniel barron
originator of Theohumanity and EBE